Open Compliance Project

Albania allows cryptocurrency trading with evolving regulations.

Algeria has banned cryptocurrency transactions.

Andorra allows cryptocurrency trading with evolving regulations.

Antigua and Barbuda allows cryptocurrency trading with evolving regulations.

Argentina has high cryptocurrency adoption driven by economic instability and inflation. While crypto is legal, the regulatory framework is still developing. The Central Bank has imposed restrictions on crypto purchases using credit cards and limits on foreign exchange for crypto transactions. The government has shown mixed signals, with some officials supporting crypto while others express concerns. The 2025 administration has indicated more crypto-friendly policies. However, capital controls and economic volatility create regulatory uncertainty. The environment requires careful monitoring as policies evolve.

Armenia allows crypto mining and is developing trading regulations.

Australia is modernizing its cryptocurrency regulatory framework with the Digital Assets Framework Bill introduced in 2025. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and AUSTRAC oversee crypto businesses. Exchanges must hold Australian Financial Services (AFS) licenses and register with AUSTRAC for AML compliance. The 2025 legislation aims to bring digital assets fully into the existing financial regulatory framework, requiring licensing for exchanges and service providers. Australia's approach emphasizes consumer protection, market integrity, and AML/CFT compliance. The regulatory environment is becoming more comprehensive, with clear pathways for compliant businesses to operate.

Austria has embraced cryptocurrency with clear regulatory frameworks under EU MiCA regulations. The country offers a stable environment for crypto businesses with transparent tax treatment and banking access.

Azerbaijan is developing crypto regulations with focus on mining.

The Bahamas has established itself as a progressive crypto jurisdiction with the DARE Act providing comprehensive regulatory clarity. The country welcomes digital asset businesses with clear licensing pathways.

Bahrain has emerged as a leading Middle Eastern crypto hub with progressive regulations from the Central Bank. The country offers streamlined licensing and a supportive regulatory environment for blockchain innovation.

Bangladesh has banned cryptocurrency transactions.

Barbados allows cryptocurrency trading with evolving regulations.

Belarus allows cryptocurrency trading with evolving regulations.

Belgium regulates crypto under EU MiCA framework with specific AML requirements.

Belize allows cryptocurrency trading with evolving regulations.

Bolivia has banned cryptocurrency transactions.

Bosnia and Herzegovina allows cryptocurrency trading with evolving regulations.

Botswana allows crypto trading with regulatory warnings.

Brazil has implemented comprehensive crypto regulations with clear tax treatment and licensing requirements. The country represents the largest crypto market in Latin America with growing institutional adoption.

Bulgaria regulates crypto under EU MiCA framework.

Cambodia has banned cryptocurrency transactions.

Canada has a well-established multi-jurisdictional regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies. Crypto exchanges are regulated as Money Services Businesses (MSBs) by FINTRAC at the federal level, while provincial securities regulators oversee crypto trading platforms. The Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) require platforms dealing in securities to register as investment dealers or marketplaces. Canada was among the first countries to approve Bitcoin ETFs in 2021. The regulatory approach emphasizes investor protection, AML compliance, and market integrity. Provincial variations exist, with some provinces having more developed frameworks than others. Overall, Canada maintains a balanced approach supporting innovation while ensuring consumer protection.

The Cayman Islands has established a comprehensive regulatory framework for virtual assets through the Virtual Asset (Service Providers) Act (VASP Act), overseen by the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA). The Act mandates registration or licensing for entities conducting virtual asset services, including custody, exchange operations, and issuance services. The framework aligns with international standards set by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) for AML/CFT compliance. The jurisdiction maintains a tax-neutral environment with no corporate, income, or capital gains taxes. However, obtaining banking services remains challenging as traditional banks are often hesitant to onboard VASPs due to perceived AML/CFT risks. Recent 2025 amendments have enhanced the licensing regime, particularly for custody providers and trading platforms, signaling greater regulatory maturity. The structured approach provides a secure environment for sophisticated institutional players but requires significant compliance infrastructure.

Central African Republic allows cryptocurrency trading with evolving regulations.

Chile has a cautious approach to crypto with evolving regulations.

China maintains one of the world's strictest cryptocurrency bans. In December 2025, the People's Bank of China doubled down on its prohibition after detecting renewed speculation in virtual assets. All cryptocurrency trading, mining, and ICO activities are banned. The government shut down all domestic exchanges in 2017 and continues to enforce strict penalties for crypto-related activities. Despite the ban, China is actively developing its own Central Bank Digital Currency (e-CBDC), the digital yuan, as part of its financial modernization strategy. The government views cryptocurrencies as threats to financial stability and capital controls.

Cryptocurrency in Colombia operates in a legal gray area, being neither explicitly illegal nor fully regulated. Awaiting the potential implementation of Bill 510 of 2025, which aims to regulate VASPs under the supervision of the Financial Superintendence of Colombia (SFC). Regulated by Financial Superintendence of Colombia (SFC).

Costa Rica allows crypto trading but lacks comprehensive regulations.

Croatia follows EU MiCA regulations with clear tax treatment for cryptocurrency activities. The country offers a stable regulatory environment for crypto businesses operating within the European framework.

Cryptocurrency is legal in Cyprus but not legal tender. The country operates within the EU's MiCA regulation framework.

Czech Republic provides a crypto-friendly environment with clear licensing requirements and reasonable tax treatment. The country has seen growing adoption of cryptocurrency among businesses and consumers.

Denmark is a crypto-friendly jurisdiction that has fully embraced the EU's MiCA regulation, with the Danish FSA as the main regulator. However, the tax regime is notably strict, with crypto gains taxed as personal income at a high progressive rate up to 53%. Crypto businesses face limited banking access, though new legislation is aimed at improving this. Regulated by Finanstilsynet.

Dominica allows cryptocurrency trading with evolving regulations.

Dominican Republic allows crypto with evolving regulations.

Ecuador banned cryptocurrency in 2014 but is reconsidering its position.

Egypt has banned cryptocurrency transactions.

El Salvador made history in September 2021 by becoming the first country to adopt Bitcoin as legal tender. However, in February 2025, the country reversed this decision under pressure from the International Monetary Fund. Bitcoin is no longer legal tender, though El Salvador continues to hold Bitcoin reserves. The experiment with Bitcoin legal tender did not achieve the hoped-for financial inclusion goals. The country still maintains some crypto-friendly policies but has stepped back from its pioneering position. The regulatory environment is in transition following the reversal of Bitcoin legal tender status.

Estonia's regulatory environment is transitioning to a MiCA-ready regime, making it a regulated jurisdiction for crypto-asset service providers (CASPs). While crypto is legal, the country has significantly tightened its anti-money laundering (AML) and capital requirements, leading to a more cautious and restricted operating environment. The main focus is on compliance with EU-wide standards and enhanced supervision by the EFSA. Regulated by Estonian Financial Supervision Authority (EFSA).

Fiji allows cryptocurrency trading with evolving regulations.

Finland offers a well-regulated crypto environment with clear licensing requirements from the Financial Supervisory Authority. The country provides strong consumer protections and transparent tax treatment.

France operates under the EU's MiCA Regulation while maintaining additional national requirements. The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) oversees crypto service providers through the PSAN (Prestataires de Services sur Actifs Numériques) registration system. France has been proactive in crypto regulation, implementing its own framework before MiCA. While generally supportive of innovation, France maintains stricter oversight than some EU peers, particularly regarding consumer protection and AML compliance. The country has called for stronger European frameworks to address concerns about uneven implementation. Additional documentation and compliance requirements may apply for certain activities.

Georgia has become a global crypto mining hub with favorable regulations and low energy costs. The country offers clear tax treatment and welcomes blockchain businesses with minimal regulatory barriers.

Germany operates under the European Union's comprehensive Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) Regulation, which took full effect in 2025. As Europe's largest economy, Germany has been a leader in crypto adoption and regulation. BaFin (Federal Financial Supervisory Authority) oversees crypto service providers, requiring licensing for exchanges, custodians, and other VASPs. Germany recognizes Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies as private money and financial instruments. The country offers favorable tax treatment for long-term holders (no capital gains tax after one year) while maintaining strict AML/CFT compliance requirements. Banks are increasingly offering crypto services under clear regulatory guidelines.

Ghana allows crypto trading but with regulatory warnings.

Greece regulates crypto under EU MiCA framework.

Grenada allows cryptocurrency trading with evolving regulations.

Guatemala allows crypto trading with minimal regulations.

Guyana allows cryptocurrency trading with evolving regulations.

Honduras allows cryptocurrency trading with evolving regulations.

Hong Kong has established a comprehensive licensing regime for Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) under the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC). The regulatory framework came into full effect in 2023, requiring all crypto exchanges to obtain licenses. Hong Kong is positioning itself as a major crypto hub in Asia, competing with Singapore. The framework includes retail trading approval, stablecoin regulations, and tokenization initiatives. Hong Kong and Singapore are building a regulated token corridor for cross-border stablecoin transactions. The regulatory approach balances innovation with robust investor protection and AML compliance.

Hungary regulates crypto under EU MiCA framework.

Iceland has capital controls that affect crypto trading.

India's cryptocurrency regulatory stance remains uncertain and evolving. As of 2025, crypto is legal but faces significant regulatory challenges. The government implemented a 30% flat tax on crypto gains plus 4% cess, and 1% TDS on transactions exceeding ₹10,000 annually. In September 2025, India indicated it would resist creating comprehensive crypto legislation, preferring partial oversight to avoid systemic risks. However, conflicting reports in December 2025 suggested potential moves toward full legalization. The Reserve Bank of India has historically been skeptical of cryptocurrencies. The regulatory environment is characterized by high taxation, uncertain legal status, and potential future restrictions. Businesses and users face compliance complexity and regulatory risk.

Indonesia permits cryptocurrency trading as a commodity but prohibits its use as a payment method. The Commodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency (Bappebti) oversees crypto exchanges. Trading is only allowed on registered platforms. The regulatory framework emphasizes consumer protection and AML compliance. Indonesia has high crypto adoption but maintains restrictions on payments to protect the rupiah. The government is exploring CBDC development. The regulatory environment requires trading through approved channels and prohibits crypto payments.

Ireland's crypto regulation is in a transitional phase, moving from a strict AML/CFT VASP registration regime under the Central Bank of Ireland to the full implementation of the EU's MiCAR by late 2025. Cryptocurrencies are treated as property, subject to a high 33% Capital Gains Tax for individuals, and corporate banking access remains challenging for crypto businesses. Regulated by Central Bank of Ireland (CBI).

Israel has developed a sophisticated approach to crypto regulation with clear guidelines from financial authorities. The country balances innovation with consumer protection in its regulatory framework.

Italy follows EU MiCA regulations with additional national requirements for crypto service providers. The country offers clear tax treatment and growing banking access for licensed entities.

Jamaica is developing crypto regulations with central bank digital currency.

Japan operates one of the world's most mature and comprehensive cryptocurrency regulatory frameworks. Crypto assets received legal status as financial products in March 2025, bringing them under insider trading restrictions and enhanced oversight. The Payment Services Act (PSA) governs cryptocurrency exchanges, which must register with the Financial Services Agency (FSA). Japan recognizes cryptocurrencies as legal property for payments and transactions. The regulatory approach balances innovation with strong consumer protection, requiring exchanges to maintain segregated customer assets, implement robust cybersecurity measures, and comply with strict AML/CFT requirements.

Jersey has established itself as a leading offshore crypto jurisdiction with comprehensive regulatory frameworks. The island offers sophisticated financial infrastructure and clear licensing pathways for digital asset businesses.

Jordan has banned cryptocurrency transactions.

Kazakhstan has evolving crypto regulations with focus on mining and trading activities.

Kenya's crypto regulation is in a transition phase following the enactment of the VASP Act 2025, which establishes a formal licensing framework under the joint oversight of the CMA and CBK. The punitive 3% Digital Asset Tax was repealed, replaced by a 10% excise duty on VASP service fees and a 15% Capital Gains Tax on profits. This marks a cautious move toward formal integration. Regulated by CMA and CBK.

Kosovo allows cryptocurrency trading with evolving regulations.

Kuwait has banned cryptocurrency trading.

Kyrgyzstan allows cryptocurrency trading with evolving regulations.

Laos legalized crypto mining in 2021 but trading remains unclear.

Latvia has strict AML requirements for crypto businesses under EU MiCA.

Lebanon has banned cryptocurrency transactions.

Liechtenstein pioneered blockchain regulation with the Token and TT Service Provider Act (TVTG). The country offers one of the most comprehensive and innovation-friendly crypto regulatory frameworks globally.

Lithuania has positioned itself as a European crypto hub with streamlined licensing processes and clear regulations. The country offers fast registration and competitive banking access for crypto businesses.

Luxembourg provides a sophisticated regulatory environment for crypto businesses with strong financial infrastructure. The country offers clear licensing pathways and access to traditional banking services.

Macau allows cryptocurrency trading with evolving regulations.

Malaysia has implemented clear crypto regulations with licensing requirements from the Securities Commission. The country balances innovation with investor protection in its regulatory approach.

Malta is fully integrating the EU's MiCA regulation, effective in 2025, replacing its pioneering VFA Act. The MFSA provides a clear licensing framework for Crypto-Asset Service Providers (CASPs). The tax regime is favorable for individuals, with no capital gains tax on long-term crypto holdings, though corporate tax applies to businesses. Regulated by MFSA.

Marshall Islands has embraced cryptocurrency with progressive regulations and plans for a sovereign digital currency. The country offers flexible incorporation options for blockchain businesses.

Mauritius has established itself as an African crypto hub with clear regulatory frameworks and favorable tax treatment. The country offers streamlined licensing and strong financial infrastructure.

Mexico's cryptocurrency regulatory environment is restrictive despite legal recognition. The 2018 Fintech Law recognizes cryptocurrencies as virtual assets but imposes significant limitations. Banks are prohibited from directly handling cryptocurrencies, and fintech companies require authorization from financial authorities to operate. The regulatory framework emphasizes consumer protection and AML compliance but has been criticized for being overly restrictive and hindering innovation. Crypto exchanges and service providers face complex licensing requirements. The government maintains a cautious stance, balancing financial inclusion goals with concerns about money laundering and financial stability. The regulatory environment requires careful navigation and may limit certain business activities.

Moldova allows cryptocurrency trading with evolving regulations.

Monaco has established a formal regulatory framework through Law No. 1.528 of 7 July 2022, which governs services on digital and crypto-assets. The legislation introduces mandatory prior approval and licensing for Crypto Asset Service Providers (CASPs), covering activities such as virtual asset exchange and negotiation platform operation. The Commission de Contrôle des Activités Financières (CCAF) ensures compliance with AML obligations. Monaco was placed on the FATF grey list in October 2025, indicating strategic deficiencies in its AML/CFT framework. The Principality plans to introduce a new crypto framework by end of 2026 to address these gaps. From a tax perspective, Monaco is highly favorable with no personal income tax on residents, extending to capital gains and income from cryptocurrency. However, banking access remains limited, with banks requiring rigorous due diligence and significantly higher minimum deposits (€2-5 million) for crypto-related wealth.

Mongolia allows cryptocurrency trading with evolving regulations.

Montenegro allows cryptocurrency trading with evolving regulations.

Morocco has banned cryptocurrency transactions.

Myanmar has banned cryptocurrency transactions.

Namibia allows cryptocurrency trading with evolving regulations.

Nepal has banned cryptocurrency transactions.

The Netherlands operates under EU MiCA while maintaining robust national oversight through De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB) and the AFM. Crypto service providers must register with DNB for AML compliance. The country has a mature regulatory framework emphasizing consumer protection and financial crime prevention. The Netherlands is home to numerous crypto businesses and maintains a supportive yet well-regulated environment. Dutch authorities have been proactive in enforcement actions against non-compliant operators while supporting legitimate businesses with clear regulatory pathways.

New Zealand has a clear and supportive regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies. The Financial Markets Authority (FMA) oversees crypto service providers. Crypto assets are treated as property under law. Service providers must comply with AML/CFT requirements. New Zealand has clear tax treatment, with the Inland Revenue providing detailed guidance. The regulatory approach emphasizes transparency, consumer protection, and AML compliance while supporting innovation. New Zealand maintains a balanced and well-defined regulatory environment for crypto businesses.

Nicaragua allows cryptocurrency trading with evolving regulations.

Nigeria has one of the world's highest cryptocurrency adoption rates despite regulatory restrictions. The Central Bank of Nigeria banned banks from servicing crypto businesses in 2021, though crypto trading remains legal. Nigerians continue to trade through P2P platforms and international exchanges. The government launched the eNaira CBDC as an alternative. High adoption is driven by remittances, inflation, and currency devaluation. The regulatory environment is restrictive but enforcement is limited. The situation is characterized by high grassroots adoption despite official discouragement.

Comprehensive restrictions and prohibitions.

North Macedonia allows cryptocurrency trading with evolving regulations.

Norway, while not an EU member, aligns closely with EU regulations through the EEA agreement. Finanstilsynet (Norwegian FSA) oversees crypto service providers. Norway has clear tax treatment for cryptocurrencies and requires AML registration. The country maintains a transparent and well-regulated environment for crypto businesses. Norwegian authorities emphasize consumer protection and financial crime prevention while supporting legitimate innovation in the crypto sector.

Oman has banned cryptocurrency transactions.

Pakistan's regulatory stance shifted in 2025 from a de facto ban to a regulated environment with the promulgation of the Virtual Assets Ordinance. This established the Pakistan Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (PVARA) to license and oversee Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs). While the State Bank of Pakistan still prohibits local banks from facilitating crypto transactions, the new framework signals a move towards formal recognition and control of the sector. Regulated by PVARA.

Panama passed crypto law in 2022 but implementation is ongoing.

Paraguay legalized crypto mining and trading in 2021.

Peru allows crypto trading but with limited regulatory framework.

The Philippines has a progressive cryptocurrency regulatory framework under the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Virtual asset service providers must obtain licenses from BSP. The Philippines has high crypto adoption, particularly for remittances. The regulatory approach distinguishes between virtual currencies (BSP) and securities tokens (SEC). Clear guidelines exist for exchanges, wallet providers, and other service providers. The framework emphasizes consumer protection, AML compliance, and financial inclusion. The Philippines maintains one of Asia's most developed crypto regulatory environments.

Poland operates under the EU MiCA framework with oversight from the Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF). Crypto exchanges must register and comply with AML regulations. Poland has clear tax treatment for cryptocurrencies. The country has a growing crypto ecosystem with increasing adoption. The regulatory approach emphasizes consumer protection and AML compliance while supporting legitimate businesses. Poland maintains a well-regulated environment aligned with EU standards, providing clarity for crypto service providers and users.

Portugal operates under the EU MiCA framework and has been known for crypto-friendly tax policies. Until recently, Portugal did not tax crypto gains for individuals (only businesses). However, tax treatment is evolving with new regulations. Crypto service providers must comply with EU and Portuguese AML requirements. Portugal has attracted crypto businesses and investors due to its favorable environment. The country maintains a balanced approach supporting innovation while ensuring compliance with EU standards. The regulatory environment is well-defined under MiCA with clear pathways for businesses.

Puerto Rico is widely considered crypto-friendly, primarily due to Act 60-2019 (Incentives Code), which grants bona fide residents a 0% local tax rate on long-term capital gains from cryptocurrency acquired after establishing residency. As a U.S. territory, it combines favorable tax treatment with access to U.S. financial infrastructure, though recent legislative proposals aim to challenge this status. Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) are classified as Money Services Businesses (MSBs) and must be licensed by the Office of the Commissioner of Financial Institutions (OCIF) under Act 136-2010. Compliance requirements mirror U.S. federal standards, including FinCEN registration and adherence to robust AML and Bank Secrecy Act programs. Banking access is available through International Financial Entities (IFEs) or crypto-friendly banks like FV Bank, though more limited than traditional sectors.

Qatar has banned cryptocurrency transactions.

Romania regulates crypto under EU MiCA framework.

Russia's cryptocurrency regulatory stance is complex and evolving, particularly given international sanctions. Crypto is legal for ownership and trading but cannot be used as a payment method. The 2020 Digital Financial Assets Law provides a basic regulatory framework. Mining is legal and regulated, with Russia being a major mining hub due to cheap electricity. However, international sanctions have complicated Russia's crypto ecosystem. The government has shown interest in using crypto for international settlements to bypass sanctions. The regulatory environment is characterized by restrictions on payments, evolving rules, and geopolitical considerations. Cross-border crypto transactions face additional scrutiny. The situation requires careful monitoring due to sanctions and regulatory uncertainty.

Rwanda is exploring crypto regulations with cautious approach.

Saint Lucia allows cryptocurrency trading with evolving regulations.

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines allows cryptocurrency trading with evolving regulations.

San Marino allows cryptocurrency trading with evolving regulations.

Saudi Arabia has historically been cautious about cryptocurrencies, with warnings from the Saudi Arabian Monetary Authority (SAMA). However, the country is exploring blockchain technology and CBDC development. Crypto trading is not explicitly illegal but lacks regulatory framework and banking support. The government has shown increasing interest in blockchain for various applications. Saudi Arabia is part of regional initiatives exploring cross-border CBDC projects. The regulatory environment is evolving, with potential for future framework development as part of Vision 2030 economic diversification.

Serbia allows cryptocurrency trading with evolving regulations.

Seychelles has established a modern and comprehensive regulatory framework for the virtual asset sector, primarily governed by the **Virtual Asset Service Providers Act, 2024** (VASP Act, Act 12 of 2024). This landmark legislation was assented to on August 26, 2024, gazetted on August 30, 2024, and officially came into force on September 1, 2024. The VASP Act's primary objective is to create a robust legislative structure for regulating virtual asset products and Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs), while simultaneously addressing potential financial crime risks, particularly money laundering and terrorism financing, in line with international standards set by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). The Act designates the **Financial Services Authority (FSA)** as the regulatory authority responsible for licensing, supervision, and enforcement. The framework is further supported by two key statutory instruments: the **Virtual Asset Service Providers (Licensing and Ongoing Requirements) Regulations, 2024** (S.I. 73 of 2024) and the **Virtual Asset Service Providers (Capital and other Financial Requirements) Regulations, 2024** (S.I. 72 of 2024). The VASP Act prohibits certain activities, such as crypto mining and the use of mixer or tumbler services, and mandates that all VASPs must be licensed to operate in or from Seychelles. This comprehensive approach signals Seychelles' commitment to fostering a regulated and secure environment for virtual asset businesses.

Singapore has established itself as a leading global crypto hub with a sophisticated regulatory framework. The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) oversees Digital Payment Token Service Providers under the Payment Services Act. The 2025 rollout of comprehensive rules under the Financial Services and Markets Act strengthened oversight while maintaining a pro-innovation stance. Singapore's approach emphasizes high regulatory standards, robust AML/CFT compliance, and strong consumer protection. The country's Project Guardian initiative explores tokenization of financial assets with clear operational frameworks. Singapore requires strict licensing but offers regulatory clarity and support for compliant businesses.

Slovakia regulates crypto under EU MiCA framework.

Slovenia's regulatory framework for crypto-assets is rapidly evolving, primarily driven by the transposition of European Union legislation. The cornerstone of the new regime is the **Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA)**, which is being implemented through the national **Zakon o izvajanju Uredbe (EU) o trgih kriptosredstev (ZIUTK)** (Act on the Implementation of the Regulation (EU) on Markets in Crypto-Assets) [1]. This law, which was in the legislative process as of late 2025, is set to significantly overhaul the regulatory landscape by requiring Crypto-Asset Service Providers (CASPs) to obtain authorization from the **Securities Market Agency (ATVP)** [2]. The draft ZIUTK is notable for its strict implementation timeline, requiring all CASPs to be authorized by **December 30, 2024**, or cease operations, bypassing the full transitional period allowed under MiCA [3]. Concurrently, the existing framework is governed by the **Zakon o preprečevanju pranja denarja in financiranja terorizma (ZPPDFT-2)** (Prevention of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Act), which mandates the registration of Virtual Currency Service Providers (VASPs) with the Office for the Prevention of Money Laundering [3]. Furthermore, the **Tax Procedure Act** is being amended to transpose the EU's DAC8 Directive and the OECD's Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF), establishing mandatory reporting obligations for Reporting Crypto-Asset Service Providers (RCASPs) to the Financial Administration (FURS) for data from the calendar year **2026** [4]. This dual approach ensures compliance with both financial stability and anti-money laundering regulations.

South Africa has high cryptocurrency adoption and is developing a comprehensive regulatory framework. The Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) declared crypto assets as financial products in 2022, bringing them under securities regulation. The Crypto Assets Regulatory Working Group is developing detailed regulations expected to be finalized in 2025-2026. While crypto is legal, the regulatory environment is in transition. South Africa has experienced major crypto scandals, driving regulatory urgency. The framework will require licensing for service providers and emphasize consumer protection.

South Korea is undergoing significant crypto regulatory reforms with the Digital Asset Basic Act expected to be finalized between late 2025 and early 2026. The country has tightened AML enforcement, expanded stablecoin oversight, and mandated reserve transparency. Won-backed stablecoins are being enabled as part of the new administration's push for crypto competitiveness. While crypto trading is legal and popular, the regulatory environment has been characterized by strict oversight, periodic crackdowns, and evolving requirements. Real-name verification is required for trading, and exchanges face stringent licensing and operational requirements. The regulatory landscape is in transition, requiring careful monitoring of compliance obligations.

Spain operates under the EU MiCA framework with additional national requirements through CNMV (National Securities Market Commission). Crypto service providers must register with the Bank of Spain for AML purposes. Spain has been proactive in crypto taxation, requiring detailed reporting of crypto holdings and transactions. The country maintains a balanced regulatory approach supporting innovation while ensuring consumer protection. Spanish banks are increasingly offering crypto services under clear regulatory guidelines. The regulatory environment emphasizes transparency, tax compliance, and AML/CFT measures.

Sri Lanka has warned against crypto but not banned it.

Sweden operates under the EU MiCA framework with oversight from Finansinspektionen (Swedish FSA). The country has a progressive approach to digital finance and crypto assets. Crypto service providers must register and comply with AML regulations. Sweden is exploring CBDC development while maintaining an open approach to private cryptocurrencies. The regulatory environment emphasizes consumer protection, transparency, and financial stability. Swedish authorities maintain active dialogue with the crypto industry to ensure effective regulation.

Switzerland, home to 'Crypto Valley' in Zug, operates one of the world's most crypto-friendly regulatory environments. The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) provides clear guidelines for crypto businesses. Switzerland amended ten existing laws to accommodate distributed ledger technology (DLT), creating a comprehensive legal framework. The country offers 0% capital gains tax on crypto for individual investors, favorable corporate tax treatment, and clear pathways to licensing through SRO membership. Banks and financial institutions actively offer crypto services. Switzerland's approach combines regulatory clarity, innovation support, and strong financial infrastructure, making it a preferred jurisdiction for crypto companies.

Taiwan regulates crypto under AML framework with increasing regulatory clarity.

Tanzania lifted crypto ban in 2022 and is developing regulations.

Thailand has a well-developed cryptocurrency regulatory framework under the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Crypto exchanges and service providers must obtain licenses. Thailand distinguishes between investment tokens (securities) and utility tokens. The regulatory approach emphasizes consumer protection, with restrictions on certain high-risk activities. The Bank of Thailand has been cautious about crypto use for payments while supporting innovation. Thailand maintains clear tax treatment and AML requirements. The regulatory environment is mature and well-defined, providing clarity for compliant businesses.

Trinidad and Tobago allows crypto with evolving regulations.

Tunisia has banned cryptocurrency transactions.

Turkey banned the use of cryptocurrencies for payments in April 2021 but allows trading and ownership. High inflation has driven significant crypto adoption despite restrictions. The Capital Markets Board oversees crypto exchanges, requiring licensing and compliance. The regulatory environment is restrictive regarding payments but permits trading through licensed platforms. Turkey has expressed interest in developing a digital lira CBDC. The situation is characterized by high adoption, payment restrictions, and evolving regulatory oversight. Economic instability and regulatory changes create uncertainty.

Uganda allows crypto trading with regulatory warnings.

Ukraine has legalized virtual assets with the "Law on Virtual Assets," but the full regulatory framework is not yet in force as of late 2025, pending tax law amendments. The National Securities and Stock Market Commission (NSSMC) is set to be the main regulator, with a focus on aligning with the EU's MiCA framework. A draft tax law proposes a combined 23% tax on individual crypto income, though a lower rate is proposed for the first few years. Regulated by National Securities and Stock Market Commission (NSSMC).

The UAE, particularly Dubai, has positioned itself as a major global crypto hub through the establishment of the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA). Law No. 4 of 2022 provides a comprehensive framework for regulating virtual assets across Dubai (excluding DIFC). VARA issues licenses for exchanges, custodians, brokers, and other virtual asset service providers. The regulatory approach is progressive and business-friendly while maintaining high compliance standards. Abu Dhabi's ADGM also operates its own crypto regulatory framework. The UAE offers tax advantages, modern infrastructure, and clear regulatory pathways, attracting major crypto companies and exchanges to establish regional headquarters.

The United Kingdom is developing a comprehensive post-Brexit cryptocurrency regulatory framework. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) oversees crypto asset firms, requiring registration for AML purposes. The UK government published plans in 2025 for stablecoin regulation and broader crypto asset frameworks. Crypto assets are recognized as property under English law. The regulatory approach aims to position the UK as a global crypto hub while ensuring robust consumer protection and financial stability. The government is actively working on legislation to bring crypto trading, lending, and staking under FCA oversight, with implementation expected in 2026.

The United States has established a comprehensive regulatory framework for cryptocurrency and blockchain technology. The GENIUS Act passed in 2025 created a federal framework for stablecoin issuers. The SEC established a Crypto Task Force to provide regulatory clarity, while the CFTC began allowing spot cryptocurrency products trading. Multiple agencies including the SEC, CFTC, FinCEN, and IRS oversee different aspects of crypto activities. Banks are increasingly permitted to engage in crypto custody, trading, and stablecoin issuance. The regulatory environment emphasizes consumer protection, AML/CFT compliance, and securities law enforcement while fostering innovation.

Uruguay allows crypto trading with evolving regulations.

Uzbekistan has legalized crypto trading and mining with regulations.

Vanuatu enacted the Virtual Asset Service Providers Act (VASP Act) in 2024, establishing a formal licensing regime for virtual asset service providers. The Vanuatu Financial Services Commission (VFSC) oversees the sector, requiring licenses for exchanges, wallet providers, and other crypto services. The framework aims to foster economic growth, attract investment, and ensure consumer protection through operational integrity standards. Vanuatu maintains a tax-neutral status with no personal income tax, capital gains tax, or inheritance tax, making profits from cryptocurrency trading or investment generally untaxed for tax residents. Despite progressive regulatory steps, banking access remains limited. While the VASP license provides regulatory legitimacy, the sector faces historical hurdles and ongoing scrutiny from the central bank, as evidenced by recent revocations of international bank licenses.

Cryptocurrency is officially legal and regulated in Venezuela, but the primary regulator, SUNACRIP, has been paralyzed since 2023 due to a corruption scandal, creating a significant regulatory vacuum and high uncertainty. The government has increasingly used crypto to bypass international sanctions, and high P2P adoption persists due to severe economic instability. Regulated by SUNACRIP.

Vietnam prohibits the use of cryptocurrencies as a means of payment but has not banned ownership or trading. The State Bank of Vietnam has issued warnings about crypto risks. Despite official restrictions, Vietnam has one of the world's highest cryptocurrency adoption rates, driven by young tech-savvy population and remittances. Trading occurs through international platforms and P2P networks. The government is exploring blockchain technology and CBDC development while maintaining restrictions on crypto payments. The regulatory environment is characterized by high grassroots adoption despite official discouragement.

Zambia allows crypto trading with regulatory warnings.

Zimbabwe lifted crypto ban in 2024 and is developing regulations.